1. $100 revenue, 20% EBITDA margin, costs 50/50 fixed vs. variable; volume increases 10%. Find EBITDA.
Check the worked answer
Costs $80: fixed $40, variable $40. Volume +10%: revenue $110, variable $44, fixed $40 -> EBITDA $26 (+30%).
Home › Free drills › Blackstone
10 past firm prompts. Answer out loud, then open the worked answer. No signup.
Round labels come from the workbook source. They describe these prompts, not a fixed interview script.
Costs $80: fixed $40, variable $40. Volume +10%: revenue $110, variable $44, fixed $40 -> EBITDA $26 (+30%).
Entry EV $1,500M; debt $900M; equity $600M. Exit EV = 9 x 200 = $1,800M; debt $600M -> equity $1,200M -> MOIC 2.0x -> IRR ~15%.
17 x 23 = 391 (20^2 - 3^2). 2:50: minute hand at 300 degrees; hour hand at 60 + 25 = 85 degrees -> difference 215 degrees -> smaller angle 145 degrees.
Gain = $20. IS: gain +20, taxes +4, NI +$16. CFS: NI +16, less gain -20 (CFO), proceeds +100 (CFI) -> cash +$96. BS: cash +96, asset -80 -> assets +16; retained earnings +16 -> balances.
Expected value of a single roll = $3.50. Strategy: after the first roll, keep it if it's 4, 5 or 6 (greater than 3.5), otherwise reroll. EV = P(4-6) x avg(4,5,6) + P(1-3) x 3.50 = 0.5 x 5 + 0.5 x 3.5 = $4.25. Pay up to $4.25.
No effect. UFCF is calculated before interest (EBIT x (1 - t) + D&A - capex - change in NWC), so it is independent of capital structure. Higher interest reduces net income, levered FCF and equity value, and a higher cost of debt could raise WACC.
Durable competitive advantage (brand, network effects, switching costs, scale, IP), pricing power, recurring and diversified revenue, high margins and returns on invested capital, low capital intensity and strong FCF conversion, reinvestment runway in a growing market, resilience through cycles, and strong management/capital allocation.
(1) How durable and defensible are the cash flows - what is the moat, customer retention and pricing power? (2) What is the downside - what could go wrong (cyclicality, competition, leverage, key-person risk) and how much could we lose? (3) What are we paying vs. what we can realistically exit at - entry valuation, value-creation plan, returns and management alignment?
All else equal (same leverage turns and growth), the 7x deal typically produces higher IRRs because cash flow yield relative to price is higher and debt paydown represents a larger share of the equity - though the 12x business may be higher quality, safer or faster growing, justifying its price. With no growth, returns come only from cash generation and deleveraging, so the 7x deal is clearly better (higher FCF yield on purchase price).
The index isn't the economy: it's dominated by global mega-cap companies (especially technology) earning revenue worldwide, not just from U.S. GDP; profit margins expanded (asset-light business models, globalization, the 2017 corporate tax cut, low interest costs); valuation multiples expanded with low rates; buybacks increased EPS; secular winners compound while GDP includes slow-growing, non-listed sectors (government, small businesses). Survivorship/index reconstitution also favors winners.
The paid file is mapped by recorded round and topic. Filter it, hide the guidance, mark gaps, and keep your copy.
Buy on GumroadSee the full scopeIndependent interview practice, not official firm material. Interview processes vary by office, group, role, and cycle.